Which of the following describes the potential harm of pesticides affecting non-target species?

The correct choice highlights an important aspect of pesticide use—its potential impact on non-target species, which can include a variety of organisms such as fish, birds, and other wildlife. Pesticides are designed to target specific pests, but due to their chemical properties and the nature of their application, they can unintentionally affect other organisms that are not the intended targets.

For instance, when pesticides enter water bodies or are carried by wind, they can affect aquatic life and bird populations, leading to wider ecological implications. This can result in disruptions to food chains and ecosystems, as well as harm to biodiversity.

The other options do not accurately represent the reality of pesticide application and its effects on non-target species. Saying that only pests are affected ignores the broader environmental consequences. Claimed limitations of pesticide effects to the application area underestimate how chemicals can disperse beyond intended zones. Lastly, asserting that all wildlife benefit from pesticide use disregards the evidence demonstrating potential risks and harm to various species in surrounding ecosystems.